Dan-Time Due Diligence

Run due diligence on Dan-Time: check compliance and get alerts when suppliers or ownership change.

Denmark · owned by JMO HOLDING ApS (Denmark) · tidsregistrering.dk · 14 vendors

Dan-Time is a Danish software company headquartered in Silkeborg that develops and sells time-tracking and workforce management systems (branded DanTimer) for businesses of all sizes. Their solutions cover employee clock-in/clock-out registration, absence and flex-time management, order/job tracking, and payroll export integrations, available via cloud subscription or on-premise purchase. The company has served thousands of daily users across hundreds of Danish and international companies since 1986.

Resilience scores

Disruption prediction

The category benchmark for Dan-Time is a 5% probability of disruption in the next three months.

4 of Dan-Time's 14 vendors have incident tracking.

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

1 service in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 14 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-10-19 · revision 3

14 direct vendors, 204 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 6/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Dan-Time exhibits medium migration readiness. A major strength is the explicitly low vendor lock-in risk, stemming from a diverse base of 14 vendors across 8 countries, which provides flexibility in adopting new technologies or providers. The company already offers cloud SaaS products, indicating existing experience with cloud environments. Additionally, GDPR compliance is in place. However, several factors reduce overall readiness. The strict data residency requirement to host data in Denmark limits options for cloud providers and regions, potentially increasing complexity and cost. Financial stability and the ability to fund a significant migration are unknown due to a lack of publicly available data. The internal tech stack, including WordPress and One.com Web Editor, is not inherently cloud-native or microservices-oriented, suggesting that a full migration might require substantial re-architecting. The existence of an 'On-Premise (Self-Hosted)' product also implies a legacy infrastructure component that would need to be addressed during migration. Finally, the NIS2 assessment requirement adds a layer of regulatory complexity that must be factored into migration planning.

Compliance

8 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

EU AI Act (source) — No public evidence

The EU AI Act will apply to providers of AI systems within the EU. If Dan-Time's products incorporate artificial intelligence, they will be subject to this regulation.

NIS2 (source) — No public evidence

Applicability depends on whether Dan-Time is considered a 'digital provider' and meets the size-cap for medium-sized entities. Without public information on employee numbers or turnover, a definitive assessment cannot be made.

Danish Working Time Registration Act — Evidence found

Dan-Time is a company established in Denmark and therefore subject to Danish labor laws, including the act requiring working time registration which entered into force on July 1, 2024.

Evidence: https://www.daniaaccounting.com/slider/time-registration-for-employees/, https://www.deloitte.com/dk/en/services/legal/perspectives/the-danish-act-on-working-hours.html, https://www.twobirds.com/en/insights/2024/denmark/nye-krav-om-registrering-af-arbejdstid-i-danmark, https://kliemt.blog/2025/08/01/on-the-clock-the-challenge-of-tracking-working-time/, https://www.softworks.com/blog/gdpr-and-time-and-attendance-tracking-all-you-need-to-know/, https://time.com/5286674/eu-gdpr-online-privacy-law/

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 7/10

Dan-Time ApS exhibits an exceptionally strong balance sheet for a micro-cap private company, with equity funding approximately 88% of total assets (DKK 3.44M of DKK 3.90M) and a liquidity ratio near 973%. These metrics indicate the company could withstand prolonged revenue disruption without external financing. The business has remained consistently profitable across all reported years and has grown equity organically from DKK 2.55M in FY2021/22 to DKK 3.44M in FY2024/25, implying disciplined retention of earnings and modest distributions. However, financial resilience is tempered by a clear multi-year deterioration in operating performance: gross profit has declined approximately 30% cumulatively over three years, and EBIT has fallen 58% from its FY2022/23 peak. The on-premise perpetual-licence model runs counter to the broader SaaS/subscription shift in time-tracking software, exposing the business to structural displacement risk. Combined with extreme scale limitations (3-4 employees, single director/owner, Denmark-only geography), the company has very limited redundancy and strategic flexibility, though its strong capital base provides meaningful cushion against short-to-medium-term stress.

Key strengths: Equity-to-assets ratio of 88.3% (very low leverage), Liquidity ratio of 972.9% (abundant short-term coverage), Continuous profitability over 4+ reported years, Equity growth from DKK 2.55M to DKK 3.44M (~10.5% CAGR), Thousands of daily users of DanTimer system in Denmark, Nearly 20 years of experience in time-registration systems, Backing of JMO Holding ApS parent group

Risk factors: Gross profit declined ~30% cumulatively over three years, EBIT fell 58% from FY2022/23 peak to FY2024/25, On-premise perpetual-licence model lagging SaaS industry trend, Extreme scale and key-person risk (3-4 employees, single director), 100% geographic concentration in Denmark, Danish-only language and marketing limits expansion, Revenue/turnover not disclosed, limiting transparency

Revenue by geography

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report