TimeLog A/S
Denmark · owned by Independent (Denmark) · www.timelog.com · 33 vendors
TimeLog A/S is a Danish software company that develops and operates TimeLog PSA, a Professional Services Automation platform combining time tracking, project management, resource planning, invoicing, and reporting into a single solution. The company primarily serves consulting and advisory organisations, helping them gain visibility into project profitability and streamline workflows from contract to invoice. Founded in 2001 and headquartered in Frederiksberg, Denmark, TimeLog has grown to serve 800+ companies globally with offices in Denmark, Sweden, and Malaysia.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 15
- Digital Resilience: 6
Disruption prediction
TimeLog A/S has an estimated 10% probability of disruption in the next 6 months.
15 of TimeLog A/S's 33 vendors monitored for disruptions.
Technology vendors
- Brandwatch — Media & Marketing — UK
- Stripe, Inc. — Financial Services — United States
- T26 ApS — Denmark
- and 30 more
Services catalogue
3 services in catalogue across 3 categories; runs on 33 sub-vendors.
- Professional Services Automation
- Time Tracking
- TimeLog
Insights
Last updated 2026-09-13 · revision 3
33 direct vendors, 360 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- United Kingdom: 2
- Finland: 1
- Denmark: 2
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Argentina: 1
- Germany: 9
- Poland: 2
Migration Readiness: 5/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
Score of 5.0 (Low Confidence). Reasoning: Without specific information on their internal tech stack (cloud platforms, architecture, containerization), it's very difficult to give a precise score. If they are an older SaaS company, they might have a mixed legacy/modern stack. Given they are a European company, they likely use some modern practices, but without details, it's speculative. If they use .NET and SQL Server, they might be on Azure, which could imply some cloud adoption, but not necessarily cloud-native or microservices. This is a speculative inference due to lack of verified data.
Financials
Three-year financials
- 2025: gross profit DKK 51.2M, EBIT DKK 3.75M, equity DKK 45.9M
- 2024: gross profit DKK 48.9M, EBIT DKK 1.87M, equity DKK 41.8M
- 2023: gross profit DKK 47.8M, EBIT DKK -3.22M, equity DKK 35.6M
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.