TransIP B.V. Due Diligence

Run due diligence on TransIP B.V.: check compliance and get alerts when suppliers change.

Netherlands · www.transip.nl · 32 vendors

TransIP B.V. is a Dutch internet services provider founded in 2003. It offers a range of IaaS products including domain registration, web hosting, Virtual Private Servers (VPS), and various cloud services. The company manages its own data centers in the Netherlands and serves over 2.5 million customers as part of the team.blue group.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

13 services in catalogue across 5 categories; runs on 32 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-05-03 · revision 11

32 direct vendors, 244 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Compliance

5 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

NIS2 (source) — No public evidence

Evidence: https://www.transip.nl/legal-and-security/certificeringen/

ISO 27001 (source) — Evidence found

Evidence: https://www.transip.nl/legal-and-security/certificeringen/, https://cdn.transip.net/site/documents/certifications/team-blue-nl-bv-iso27001-eng-20250408.pdf

SOC 2 (source) — No public evidence

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 6/10

TransIP B.V. demonstrates solid operational resilience underpinned by a recurring-revenue subscription model spanning domain registration, shared hosting, VPS, and cloud services. The company has over 20 years of operational history in the Dutch market, self-owned infrastructure, and a well-diversified product portfolio that reduces dependence on any single revenue stream. These characteristics are consistent with stable cash generation and low customer churn relative to project-based businesses. The company benefits from strong parent backing via team.blue, which is itself supported by two major private equity firms — Cinven and Hg Capital — providing access to significant capital for investment, M&A, and technology development. TransIP's GDPR/data sovereignty positioning and developer-friendly ecosystem create meaningful customer stickiness, particularly among Dutch SMEs and technical users. However, the PE-backed holding structure typically involves significant leveraged buyout debt at the group level, which introduces financial risk that is not visible at the TransIP entity level. The complete absence of publicly disclosed audited financials — revenue, EBIT, and equity are all unconfirmed — makes independent verification of profitability, leverage, or cash flow impossible, materially limiting confidence in any resilience assessment. Structural risks include intense competition from global players (GoDaddy, Hostinger, IONOS) and regional Dutch competitors, commoditisation of core domain and shared hosting products, heavy geographic concentration in the Netherlands (estimated 85–90% of revenue), and exposure to SME customer churn during economic downturns. Integration risk within a 60+ brand PE-owned group and potential strategic direction changes driven by investor exit timelines add further uncertainty.

Key strengths: Recurring subscription-based revenue model with high predictability and low churn, 20+ years of operational history and strong brand recognition in the Netherlands, Self-owned data centre infrastructure supporting margin control, Diversified product portfolio across domains, hosting, VPS, cloud, and managed services, PE-backed parent (team.blue / Cinven / Hg Capital) providing capital access, GDPR/data sovereignty positioning as competitive differentiator for EU customers, Developer-friendly API ecosystem creating technical user stickiness, Active product investment in higher-ARPU cloud and managed services segments

Risk factors: Complete absence of public audited financials prevents independent verification of profitability or leverage, PE-backed LBO structure likely involves significant group-level debt not visible at entity level, Intense competition from global (GoDaddy, Hostinger, IONOS, Cloudflare) and Dutch regional players, Core domain registration and shared hosting products are highly commoditised with structural margin pressure, Heavy geographic concentration — estimated 85–90% of revenue from the Netherlands, SME customer base is sensitive to economic downturns, increasing churn risk, Integration and strategic autonomy risks within a 60+ brand PE-owned group, Investor exit timeline pressures may drive strategic decisions not aligned with long-term brand health

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report