TransIP B.V.

Netherlands · www.transip.nl · 32 vendors

TransIP B.V. is a Dutch internet services provider founded in 2003. It offers a range of IaaS products including domain registration, web hosting, Virtual Private Servers (VPS), and various cloud services. The company manages its own data centers in the Netherlands and serves over 2.5 million customers as part of the team.blue group.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

12 services in catalogue across 4 categories; runs on 32 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-05-03 · revision 11

32 direct vendors, 299 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 8/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

TransIP exhibits high migration readiness, primarily driven by its highly modern, cloud-native, and open-source focused tech stack. The core infrastructure is built on open-source technologies such as OpenStack, KVM, Ceph, and Kubernetes, which significantly reduces vendor lock-in and provides substantial flexibility for migrating to other cloud platforms or hybrid environments. The extensive use of Kubernetes for container orchestration and Terraform/REST API for Infrastructure-as-Code enables automated, repeatable, and efficient migration processes. As a provider that builds its own IaaS (OpenStack), TransIP possesses deep technical expertise in cloud infrastructure, which is a major asset for managing complex migrations. However, migration efforts would face challenges due to strict GDPR and potential NIS2 compliance requirements, coupled with data residency requirements in the Netherlands. These regulatory constraints necessitate careful planning to ensure any new environment meets legal obligations, potentially limiting certain migration options. The absence of financial stability data also makes it difficult to assess the company's capacity to fund a potentially large-scale migration effort. While vendor geographic diversity is a strength, the integration of 60 services from various vendors could imply significant integration complexity during a full ecosystem migration.

Compliance

5 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

NIS2 (source) — Assessment Required

TransIP operates as a digital infrastructure provider offering hosting, VPS, and cloud services, which could classify them as an Important Entity under NIS2. However, without confirmed employee count or annual turnover data, and unclear classification within NIS2 sectors, the risk level is medium. If they exceed the 50+ employee or €10M+ turnover threshold, NIS2 would apply with significant cybersecurity requirements.

Evidence: https://www.transip.nl/legal-and-security/certificeringen/

SOC 2 (source) — Assessment Required

As a cloud services provider offering VPS, hosting, and infrastructure services, SOC2 compliance would be valuable for customer assurance, especially for business clients. The medium risk reflects the potential competitive disadvantage and customer trust issues if SOC2 compliance is not maintained, though it's not legally required.

ISO 27001 (source) — Compliant

TransIP holds current ISO 27001:2022 certification, demonstrating strong information security management practices. This significantly reduces security-related risks and provides customer assurance. The low risk reflects their proactive approach to information security management and regular certification maintenance.

Evidence: https://www.transip.nl/legal-and-security/certificeringen/, https://cdn.transip.net/site/documents/certifications/team-blue-nl-bv-iso27001-eng-20250408.pdf

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 6/10

TransIP B.V. demonstrates solid operational resilience underpinned by a recurring-revenue subscription model spanning domain registration, shared hosting, VPS, and cloud services. The company has over 20 years of operational history in the Dutch market, self-owned infrastructure, and a well-diversified product portfolio that reduces dependence on any single revenue stream. These characteristics are consistent with stable cash generation and low customer churn relative to project-based businesses. The company benefits from strong parent backing via team.blue, which is itself supported by two major private equity firms — Cinven and Hg Capital — providing access to significant capital for investment, M&A, and technology development. TransIP's GDPR/data sovereignty positioning and developer-friendly ecosystem create meaningful customer stickiness, particularly among Dutch SMEs and technical users. However, the PE-backed holding structure typically involves significant leveraged buyout debt at the group level, which introduces financial risk that is not visible at the TransIP entity level. The complete absence of publicly disclosed audited financials — revenue, EBIT, and equity are all unconfirmed — makes independent verification of profitability, leverage, or cash flow impossible, materially limiting confidence in any resilience assessment. Structural risks include intense competition from global players (GoDaddy, Hostinger, IONOS) and regional Dutch competitors, commoditisation of core domain and shared hosting products, heavy geographic concentration in the Netherlands (estimated 85–90% of revenue), and exposure to SME customer churn during economic downturns. Integration risk within a 60+ brand PE-owned group and potential strategic direction changes driven by investor exit timelines add further uncertainty.

Key strengths: Recurring subscription-based revenue model with high predictability and low churn, 20+ years of operational history and strong brand recognition in the Netherlands, Self-owned data centre infrastructure supporting margin control, Diversified product portfolio across domains, hosting, VPS, cloud, and managed services, PE-backed parent (team.blue / Cinven / Hg Capital) providing capital access, GDPR/data sovereignty positioning as competitive differentiator for EU customers, Developer-friendly API ecosystem creating technical user stickiness, Active product investment in higher-ARPU cloud and managed services segments

Risk factors: Complete absence of public audited financials prevents independent verification of profitability or leverage, PE-backed LBO structure likely involves significant group-level debt not visible at entity level, Intense competition from global (GoDaddy, Hostinger, IONOS, Cloudflare) and Dutch regional players, Core domain registration and shared hosting products are highly commoditised with structural margin pressure, Heavy geographic concentration — estimated 85–90% of revenue from the Netherlands, SME customer base is sensitive to economic downturns, increasing churn risk, Integration and strategic autonomy risks within a 60+ brand PE-owned group, Investor exit timeline pressures may drive strategic decisions not aligned with long-term brand health

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report