uShip

United States · www.uship.com · 47 vendors

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

1 service in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 47 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-08-16 · revision 2

47 direct vendors, 358 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 6/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

uShip exhibits moderate migration readiness, primarily supported by its adoption of modern web frameworks like Astro, a headless CMS (Sanity), and extensive API integration options. These elements suggest a modular architecture that could facilitate the re-platforming or migration of specific services. The absence of specified data residency requirements provides significant flexibility for cloud migration strategies. The existing use of a CDN (ushipcdn.cloud) indicates some familiarity with cloud infrastructure. However, several factors introduce uncertainty and potential challenges. The core 'Online Marketplace / Two-Sided Platform Technology' and 'Dynamic Pricing Engine,' while sophisticated, could be complex and potentially monolithic, requiring substantial effort to refactor or migrate to a cloud-native architecture. The presence of WordPress in the internal tech stack might also represent a legacy component that could complicate migration efforts. Crucially, there is no data on the regulatory environment, which could impose unforeseen compliance requirements during migration. Financial stability and the ability to fund a significant migration are also unknown due to missing revenue and growth data. While vendor geographic diversity is noted, the 'Vendor Lock-in Risk' is explicitly stated as unknown, and the total number of vendors is not provided, making it difficult to assess the complexity of managing external dependencies and contracts during a migration.

Compliance

9 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

ISO 27001 (source) — Assessment Required

uShip processes personal data for over 6.1 million customers across 12+ countries and operates a digital marketplace with API integrations for business clients. ISO 27001 certification would be expected for a platform of this scale, particularly given its international operations and EU presence. The absence of any public ISO 27001 certification is a gap, though many US-based SMEs and mid-market companies operate without formal ISO 27001 certification, relying instead on internal security frameworks. Risk is Medium because uShip's international operations (especially EU) and B2B enterprise segment create expectations for formal information security management certification.

Evidence: https://help.uship.com/hc/en-us/articles/360009056894-Privacy-Policy, https://about.uship.com/

NIS2 (source) — Assessment Required

NIS2 applies to entities operating in the EU in specific sectors. uShip is a digital marketplace/platform operating in the transport sector in the EU (Germany, France, Netherlands, Spain, Austria). The transport sector is listed as an Essential Entity sector under NIS2. However, NIS2 applicability depends on whether uShip qualifies as a 'transport' entity under the directive's specific definitions (which focus on transport infrastructure operators, not necessarily digital marketplaces facilitating transport bookings) or as a 'digital provider' (online marketplace). As a US-headquartered company with EU-facing websites, uShip may fall under NIS2 as a digital service provider/online marketplace (Important Entity category) if it meets the size threshold (50+ employees or €10M+ turnover). Risk is assessed as Low because uShip is not a critical infrastructure operator itself — it is a marketplace platform — and enforcement of NIS2 against non-EU digital marketplaces is still evolving. However, formal assessment is required.

Evidence: https://www.uship.com/de/, https://www.uship.com/fr/, https://www.uship.com/nl/, https://www.uship.com/es/, https://www.uship.com/at/, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32022L2555

EU-US Data Privacy Framework — Compliant

uShip has self-certified to the EU-US Data Privacy Framework and UK Extension, which is the current legally recognized mechanism for transferring personal data from the EU/UK to the US following the invalidation of Privacy Shield. The DPF is overseen by the US Department of Commerce and enforced by the Federal Trade Commission. Self-certification is a formal legal commitment and uShip's privacy policy explicitly states adherence to DPF Principles. Risk is Low as long as the DPF remains legally valid (it was upheld by the EU Commission's adequacy decision in July 2023) and uShip maintains its certification. The main residual risk is potential future legal challenge to the DPF framework itself.

Evidence: https://help.uship.com/hc/en-us/articles/360009056894-Privacy-Policy, https://www.dataprivacyframework.gov/, https://feedback-form.truste.com/watchdog/request

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 6/10

uShip demonstrates moderate financial resilience as a private, asset-light marketplace that confirmed profitability in 2022 despite macroeconomic headwinds including inflation, geopolitical strife, and record-high fuel costs. The company's marketplace model insulates it from direct capital intensity and fuel-price exposure at the platform level, and it has successfully shifted its revenue mix toward higher-value business shippers (from 14% in 2020 to 51% in 2022), which typically yields better unit economics and recurring revenue characteristics. However, several factors temper the resilience assessment. GMV growth decelerated sharply from +57.5% in 2021 to just +3% in 2022, and shipment count actually declined 6.5% year-over-year. The absence of any public financial disclosure since February 2024, combined with a mid-cycle CEO transition in January 2023, introduces meaningful transparency and execution risks. The freight industry has been in a multi-year downcycle post-2022, and peers like Convoy have shut down, indicating sector-wide stress. Strengths include 20 years of operating history, strong network effects with 41,000 active service providers and 6.1M lifetime customers, diversified verticals, and embedded enterprise integrations with partners like Etsy, eBay Motors, and Chairish. The lack of audited financials and no SEC filings limits deeper assessment, but the confirmed profitability and diversified revenue base support a middle-range resilience score.

Key strengths: Asset-light marketplace model with limited capital intensity, Confirmed profitability in 2022 despite macro headwinds, Strong shift to B2B revenue mix (51% in 2022 vs 14% in 2020), Network effects with 41,000 active service providers and 6.1M lifetime customers, 20 years of pricing data as competitive moat, Diversified verticals reducing single-market risk, Enterprise integrations with Etsy, eBay Motors, Chairish, 1stDibs

Risk factors: No audited financials publicly available, Sharp deceleration in GMV growth (57.5% to 3%), Shipment count declined 6.5% YoY in 2022, CEO transition in January 2023 during difficult freight cycle, No press releases or KPI disclosures since February 2024, Exposure to multi-year freight industry downcycle, Competition from Uber Freight, C.H. Robinson, XPO, and specialists, Regulatory risk from independent contractor classification laws

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report