Vaisala

Finland · www.vaisala.com · 34 vendors

Vaisala is a Finnish technology company that develops and manufactures products and services for environmental and industrial measurement. They provide critical weather and climate observation systems, as well as high-end humidity, dew point, and CO2 measurements for various industries. Their solutions enable data-driven climate action and support safety and operational efficiency worldwide.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

2 services in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 34 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-03-04 · revision 5

34 direct vendors, 310 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 9/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Vaisala demonstrates very high migration readiness, primarily driven by its advanced and cloud-native internal tech stack. The company extensively utilizes Microsoft Azure and AWS, indicating a strong existing presence and expertise in cloud environments. The adoption of Kubernetes and Docker for containerization, coupled with Infrastructure as Code (Terraform), signifies a highly agile and portable infrastructure capable of seamless migration and deployment across different cloud platforms. The use of modern development languages (Python, Java), API technologies (REST APIs, GraphQL), and CI/CD tools (Azure DevOps, GitHub Actions, Jenkins) further supports a microservices-oriented architecture, which is ideal for cloud migration. A significant factor contributing to high readiness is the stated "Total Vendors: 0". Interpreting this as minimal to no direct external vendor dependencies implies very low vendor lock-in, providing maximum flexibility and reducing complexity and cost associated with contract renegotiations or technology replacements during a migration. While the data also mentions "Total Services: 80" originating from "6 unique countries", this does not contradict the low direct vendor lock-in for migration purposes. Furthermore, "Data Residency Requirements: Not specified" removes a common hurdle for cloud migrations. While the presence of C/C++ and SAP (ERP) might suggest some legacy components requiring specific consideration, the overall technological landscape is exceptionally well-suited for migration. Missing data on the regulatory environment and financial stability prevents a comprehensive assessment in those specific areas.

Compliance

4 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

NIS2 (source) — Assessment Required

Vaisala operates in measurement instruments and industrial solutions, which could potentially fall under NIS2 if they provide critical infrastructure services or digital services. With 2,400+ employees and €596.9M revenue, they exceed size thresholds. However, their specific sector classification (weather/environmental monitoring vs. critical infrastructure) requires detailed assessment. Medium risk due to potential regulatory oversight and security requirements if applicable.

ISO 27001 (source) — Assessment Required

As a global technology company with significant revenue (€596.9M) and international operations, ISO 27001 certification would be expected for information security management. Medium risk as lack of certification could impact customer confidence and competitive positioning, especially in B2B markets where security certifications are often required.

GDPR (source) — Assessment Required

As a Finnish company (EU member state) with 2,400+ employees globally and operations in 150+ countries, Vaisala certainly processes personal data of EU residents (employee data, customer data, supplier data). GDPR compliance is mandatory for EU-based companies processing personal data. High risk due to potential fines up to 4% of annual turnover (€596.9M in 2025 = potential fines up to €23.9M) and reputational damage. Large multinational companies face higher scrutiny and complexity in GDPR compliance.

Financials

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report