Vercara, LLC

United States · vercara.com · 29 vendors

Vercara, LLC is a global provider of cloud-delivered security services that safeguard businesses' online presence and digital infrastructure. The company offers a suite of solutions including DNS, DDoS protection, and web application firewall (WAF) services. Vercara aims to protect networks and applications against threats and downtime, ensuring reliable online interactions for its customers.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

6 services in catalogue across 4 categories; runs on 29 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-05-23 · revision 7

29 direct vendors, 327 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 4/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Vercara's migration readiness is assessed as medium, leaning towards the lower end, primarily due to the significant complexity introduced by its regulatory and data residency environment. As a global DNS and cybersecurity provider, Vercara faces stringent data residency requirements (EU GDPR, national cybersecurity laws, financial, healthcare, and government sector mandates) which necessitate careful data placement and could limit cloud provider options, making any migration technically challenging and costly. The regulatory landscape includes multiple 'Assessment Required' regulations with high-risk implications (GDPR, NIS2, HIPAA, SOC2, ISO 27001). Achieving and maintaining compliance during and after migration will require substantial effort, resources, and validation, adding significant overhead. Financially, the declining revenue trend from 2020 to 2023 (estimated ~$250–270M to ~$100–150M) suggests potential budget constraints that could hinder the funding of a large-scale migration project. A major gap in the assessment is the lack of information regarding Vercara's internal tech stack (e.g., cloud-native, containerization, microservices vs. legacy monolithic architecture). Without this, it's difficult to ascertain the technical ease or difficulty of migration. While Vercara offers cloud-based services, this does not necessarily reflect their internal infrastructure. Vendor lock-in risk is also unknown, which could be a significant impediment if they are heavily reliant on specific vendors. The geographic diversity of vendor HQs (6 countries) might suggest a less concentrated vendor ecosystem, but the actual number of vendors and the nature of their services are not provided, making a definitive assessment of vendor lock-in difficult.

Compliance

4 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

HIPAA (source) — Assessment Required

Cybersecurity companies often serve healthcare clients and may handle Protected Health Information (PHI). If Vercara provides services to healthcare entities that involve PHI access, HIPAA compliance is mandatory. The risk is medium because healthcare is a common vertical for cybersecurity services, and HIPAA violations can result in significant penalties ranging from $100 to $50,000 per violation.

GDPR (source) — Assessment Required

As a US-based cybersecurity company, Vercara likely processes personal data of EU/EEA residents through their services, making GDPR applicable. The risk level is medium because while cybersecurity companies often have robust data protection measures, GDPR compliance requires specific legal frameworks, privacy policies, and data processing agreements. Non-compliance can result in fines up to 4% of annual turnover or €20 million.

ISO 27001 (source) — Assessment Required

ISO 27001 is a fundamental information security management standard that is highly expected in the cybersecurity industry. Clients often require their cybersecurity vendors to be ISO 27001 certified. The risk is high because lack of certification can impact competitive positioning and client acquisition, especially for enterprise clients who mandate this certification.

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 6/10

Vercara, LLC is a private cybersecurity company with no publicly disclosed audited financial statements, making external credit assessment difficult. The company emerged from the Neustar Security Services carve-out in 2021, was rebranded in 2023, and was acquired by DigiCert in August 2024. Deal valuations suggest enterprise value in the US$1-2 billion range, with industry analysts estimating revenue in the low-to-mid hundreds of millions USD, though unverified. Strengths supporting resilience include a sticky enterprise customer base inherited from Neustar/UltraDNS (including Fortune 500 and government accounts), recurring SaaS-style subscription revenue with typically high gross margins (70%+ industry comparables), and critical-infrastructure positioning in managed DNS and DDoS protection with high renewal rates. The acquisition by DigiCert provides scale, broader product portfolio integration, and continued PE-backed financial support from Clearlake Capital, Crosspoint Capital, and TA Associates. Risks include opaque financials due to private ownership, likely high-leverage PE ownership structures with significant debt service requirements, intense competition from larger cloud-security platforms like Cloudflare, Akamai, AWS, and Microsoft, integration risk following the DigiCert acquisition, and potential customer concentration risk from legacy large telecom and government accounts.

Key strengths: Established enterprise customer base inherited from Neustar/UltraDNS including Fortune 500 and government accounts, Recurring SaaS-style subscription revenue with high gross margins (70%+ industry comparables), Critical-infrastructure positioning in DNS and DDoS protection with high renewal rates, Acquisition by DigiCert (August 2024) provides scale and broader product portfolio, Strong PE sponsorship from Clearlake, TA Associates, and Crosspoint Capital, Enterprise value reported in US$1-2 billion range across two transactions

Risk factors: Opaque financials with no public disclosure makes credit assessment difficult, High-leverage PE ownership model with significant debt service requirements, Intense competition from Cloudflare, Akamai, AWS Route 53/Shield, Microsoft, Integration risk post-DigiCert acquisition (organizational, technical, customer attrition), Customer concentration risk from legacy large telecom and government accounts, Pricing pressure in DNS/DDoS market from larger cloud-security platforms

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report