Web Inclusion GmbH

Germany · www.eyeable.info · 8 vendors

Web Inclusion GmbH, operating as Eye-Able®, is a comprehensive provider of digital accessibility solutions. The company offers software, testing services, training, and workshops to help businesses make their websites and digital products accessible. Their mission is to foster an inclusive digital environment, ensuring equal access to online information and services for all individuals.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

1 service in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 8 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-07-30 · revision 5

8 direct vendors, 172 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 6/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Web Inclusion GmbH demonstrates medium migration readiness, leaning towards the higher end due to potential vendor independence. A significant strength for migration readiness is the data point 'Total Vendors: 0,' which, if accurate, implies no external vendor lock-in. This would grant the company complete control over its infrastructure and software, allowing for greater flexibility in choosing migration strategies and timelines without being constrained by third-party contracts or dependencies. The 'SaaS / CDN-delivered JavaScript widgets' product delivery model also suggests a potentially modular and distributed architecture, which can be inherently easier to migrate compared to a monolithic, on-premise system. However, several challenges exist. The primary hurdles stem from the regulatory environment and data residency requirements. As a German company, Web Inclusion GmbH must adhere to strict EU GDPR and German BDSG data residency rules, requiring personal data of EU residents to be processed within the EU/EEA or in countries with adequacy decisions. This significantly limits the choice of cloud providers and regions for migration. Furthermore, multiple regulatory frameworks (GDPR, NIS2, SOC2, ISO 27001) are 'Assessment Required' with medium to high risk, implying that any migration would necessitate careful planning and execution to maintain continuous compliance, potentially increasing complexity and cost. The lack of information regarding the company's 'Internal Tech Stack' is a major gap, making it impossible to assess the degree of cloud-nativeness, containerization, or microservices adoption, which are critical indicators of migration ease. The null growth history also means financial capacity to fund a potentially complex migration is unknown. Similar to resilience, the contradiction between 'Total Vendors: 0' and the existence of 'Vendor HQ Countries' and 'Total Services: 13' introduces uncertainty; this reasoning assumes 'Total Vendors: 0' is correct for the purpose of this assessment.

Compliance

4 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

SOC 2 (source) — Assessment Required

SOC2 applicability depends on whether Web Inclusion GmbH provides cloud services, SaaS solutions, or handles customer data that would require trust and security assurance. The medium risk level is assigned because: (1) SOC2 is often required by enterprise customers for vendor due diligence, (2) lack of SOC2 compliance can limit business opportunities with security-conscious clients, (3) the 'Web Inclusion' name suggests potential digital/web services that might benefit from SOC2 certification, though this requires verification.

ISO 27001 (source) — Assessment Required

ISO 27001 is a voluntary information security management standard that's increasingly expected in B2B relationships, especially in Europe. The medium risk level reflects: (1) competitive disadvantage without certification in security-conscious markets, (2) potential customer requirements for ISO 27001 compliance, (3) regulatory expectations in some sectors for robust information security management, (4) German market preference for internationally recognized standards.

GDPR (source) — Assessment Required

GDPR is universally applicable to all companies located in the EU/EEA that process any personal data. Given that Web Inclusion GmbH is headquartered in Germany (EU member state), GDPR compliance is mandatory regardless of business type. The high risk level is assigned because: (1) GDPR fines can reach up to 4% of annual global turnover or €20 million, whichever is higher, (2) German data protection authorities (particularly the Federal Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information) actively enforce GDPR, (3) virtually all businesses process some form of personal data (employee, customer, or supplier data), making non-compliance highly likely without proper measures.

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 3/10

Web Inclusion GmbH (eyeable.info) is a small German private limited company (GmbH) operating in the accessibility technology/software niche. As a small private entity, it is subject to limited disclosure requirements under German commercial law (HGB), and no financial statements, revenue figures, EBIT, or equity data were retrievable from the German trade register (Handelsregister), Bundesanzeiger, or other public sources during this research effort. The complete absence of publicly available financial data makes any quantitative resilience assessment impossible.

Key strengths: Operates in the growing web accessibility and assistive technology market, which benefits from increasing regulatory pressure (e.g., EU Web Accessibility Directive, European Accessibility Act), Niche product focus (eyeable screen reader/accessibility overlay) may provide defensible market positioning, GmbH legal structure provides limited liability protection typical of German SMEs, Small company size likely means lean cost structure with lower fixed overhead

Risk factors: No publicly available financial data — complete opacity on revenue, profitability, and balance sheet health, Very small company size increases vulnerability to customer concentration, key-person dependency, and cash flow volatility, Competitive market with larger accessibility solution providers (e.g., AudioEye, accessiBe) that have significantly greater resources, Limited geographic and product diversification likely based on available company profile information, Dependence on continued regulatory tailwinds; any slowdown in enforcement could reduce demand

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report