Zencurity ApS

Denmark · owned by Independent (Denmark) · zencurity.com · 8 vendors

Zencurity ApS is a Danish cybersecurity company that provides proactive security services to organisations and individuals in Denmark and the EU. Their offerings include penetration testing, network security consulting, ISMS implementation (ISO 27001, NIS2, DORA), DDoS testing, personal digital security, and internet resource registration. They also deliver security training courses and have served medium to large enterprises with high security requirements for over 20 years.

Resilience scores

Disruption prediction

Zencurity ApS has an estimated 27% probability of disruption in the next 6 months.

6 of Zencurity ApS's 8 vendors monitored for disruptions.

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

2 services in catalogue across 2 categories; runs on 8 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-09-13 · revision 29

8 direct vendors, 189 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 5/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Zencurity ApS exhibits medium migration readiness. The company's tech stack, while robust and security-focused, is predominantly traditional (e.g., OpenBSD, Debian Linux, BGP routing, RIPE NCC IP infrastructure) and is not explicitly cloud-native, containerized, or microservices-based. This implies that a significant re-platforming or re-architecture effort would be required for a comprehensive cloud migration, rather than a simple lift-and-shift, increasing complexity and cost. Strict regulatory and data residency requirements also pose significant challenges. GDPR Chapter V restrictions on international data transfers, specific data residency needs for backup services and the Port Scan API (app.scanlab.dk), and potential contractual data residency requirements from Danish public sector clients would necessitate careful planning and potentially limit choices for cloud providers or regions. Additionally, the existing internal compliance documentation gaps (GDPR, SOC 2, ISO 27001) would need to be thoroughly addressed during any migration to ensure continued and demonstrable compliance. The financial capacity to fund a major migration is unknown due to a lack of specific revenue or employee figures. Conversely, several factors facilitate migration readiness. Zencurity's extensive use of open-source technologies (e.g., OpenBSD, Debian, Suricata, Zeek, Elasticsearch) significantly reduces proprietary vendor lock-in, offering flexibility in choosing new platforms. The use of Ansible for automation aids in configuration management and repeatable deployments, which is beneficial for migration. The presence of a REST API for their ScanLab product indicates some modularity in their service architecture. Furthermore, the geographic diversity of their vendor ecosystem (3 unique countries for 32 services) suggests a lower risk of lock-in to any single vendor, providing more flexibility in vendor selection post-migration.

Compliance

4 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

ISO 27001 (source) — Assessment Required

ISO/IEC 27001:2022 is highly relevant to Zencurity ApS for multiple reasons: (1) Zencurity explicitly offers ISO 27001 implementation services to clients, demonstrating deep expertise; (2) their service page references ISO 27001:2022 section 8.13 for backup requirements; (3) their target market of medium-to-large enterprises with high security requirements will frequently require their security vendors to hold ISO 27001 certification as a procurement prerequisite. The risk level is Medium because: while ISO 27001 is voluntary, the absence of certification for a cybersecurity company selling ISO 27001 implementation services creates a credibility and competitive risk. Enterprise procurement teams often require vendors to demonstrate the same standards they sell. The reputational and commercial risk of not being certified is moderate to significant.

Evidence: https://zencurity.com/services/, https://www.iso.org/standard/27001, https://zencurity.com

Danish Bookkeeping Act — Assessment Required

All Danish companies registered with CVR are subject to the Danish Bookkeeping Act (Bogføringsloven, consolidated act no. 700 of 2023). This requires proper accounting records, digital bookkeeping for companies above certain thresholds, and 5-year retention of financial records. As a registered ApS (private limited company), Zencurity must comply. Risk level is Low as this is standard business compliance for all Danish companies, and non-compliance risk is low for an established company operating since 2010.

Evidence: https://datacvr.virk.dk/data/visenhed?enhedstype=virksomhed&id=32941184&soeg=32941184, https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2023/700

SOC 2 (source) — Assessment Required

SOC 2 (AICPA Trust Services Criteria) is a voluntary framework primarily relevant for cloud service providers and technology companies that store, process, or transmit customer data. Zencurity provides cloud-adjacent services including their Port Scan API (app.scanlab.dk), off-site backup services described as 'geo-redundant,' and managed security services. These service lines could make SOC 2 relevant, particularly if enterprise clients request assurance over Zencurity's controls. The risk level is Medium because: (1) SOC 2 is voluntary but increasingly demanded by enterprise clients as a procurement requirement; (2) Zencurity's target market of 'medium to large companies with high security requirements' are precisely the clients most likely to require SOC 2 reports from vendors; (3) absence of a SOC 2 report could be a competitive disadvantage or procurement barrier. However, as a small Danish company, US-centric SOC 2 may be less relevant than EU-equivalent frameworks like ISAE 3402.

Evidence: https://zencurity.com/services/, https://app.scanlab.dk, https://www.aicpa-cima.com/resources/landing/system-and-organization-controls-soc-suite-of-services

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 6/10

Zencurity ApS demonstrates qualitative resilience typical of a long-established founder-led boutique consultancy. The company has been operating since 2010 (approximately 15 years) and claims some client relationships exceeding 20 years, suggesting stable recurring advisory revenue and low churn. Its positioning around EU regulatory tailwinds (NIS2, DORA, CER, ISO 27001:2022) aligns with a strong compliance-driven demand cycle for cybersecurity services through 2024-2027, providing a favorable market backdrop. The firm benefits from niche credibility through its RIPE NCC Local Internet Registry status and specialized BGP/network expertise, differentiating it from generic pentest shops. Revenue diversification across consulting, pentesting, training (via PROSA), an emerging productised SaaS-style offering (Port Scan API/scanlab.dk), and personal-security services provides multiple income streams. A very low fixed cost base as a personal-brand ApS reduces breakeven risk. However, resilience is constrained by significant key-person dependency on principal Henrik Kramshøj, limited scale (likely 1-4 employees with modest equity buffers), client concentration risk within a small Danish B2B base, and limited productisation capacity for scaling the Port Scan API. Specific financial figures could not be retrieved to verify equity buffers, cash position, or profit trajectory, which reduces confidence in the assessment.

Key strengths: Long client tenure with some relationships exceeding 20 years, EU regulatory tailwinds (NIS2, DORA, CER, ISO 27001:2022), Niche credibility via RIPE NCC LIR status and BGP/network expertise, Diversified revenue lines across consulting, training, and productised services, Very low fixed cost base reducing breakeven risk, 15 years of continuous operation since 2010

Risk factors: Key-person dependency on single principal Henrik Kramshøj, Small scale with likely modest revenue and equity buffers, Client concentration risk in small Danish B2B base, Productisation risk - Port Scan API lacks visible sales/marketing capacity to scale, Limited disclosure via abbreviated class-B ApS accounts reduces stakeholder visibility, Single lost large client could materially impact results

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report